Judge turns down move to lock up pregnant sect member

Associated Press / August 29, 2000
By Chris Lehourites

Attleboro, Mass. (AP) -- A judge denied a prosecutor's request Tuesday to lock up a pregnant member of a fundamentalist sect suspected of covering up the death of her last baby. The judge instead ordered a nurse to visit the woman daily in an effort to protect the unborn child.

Judge Kenneth P. Nasif's decision came despite protests from both Rebecca Corneau, who is 8 1/2 months pregnant, and her husband, who has been in jail for refusing to cooperate in an investigation into the sect.

"In no way at all will I accept any kind of medical assistance. It is against God," Mrs. Corneau told the judge in the closed-door hearing, according to Gerald Fitzgerald, an assistant district attorney.

Fitzgerald said Mrs. Corneau's husband, David, who was led into the courtroom in handcuffs and leg irons, told the court: "You cannot force the medical system on myself and my wife. Only one holds the key to life and death, and that's God Almighty himself, not the medical system."

Bristol County District Attorney Paul F. Walsh Jr. went to Attleboro Juvenile Court to argue for the unusual "pre-emptive care" petition to put Corneau in custody for the remainder of her pregnancy.

"Someone must act to protect that baby," Walsh said in a news release. "I would never forgive myself if I stood by doing nothing and then something bad happened to that baby."

Nasif authorized the nurse to call for police assistance if she is denied access to the house. If Mrs. Corneau refuses to allow the nurse in, she could be jailed for contempt.

Fitzgerald said she responded that "I will not allow her in my home." Nasif ruled two weeks ago that Mrs. Corneau, 32, is an unfit mother, and placed her three children in state custody.

Sitting outside the courtroom before the hearing with four other women, Corneau said she had no comment.

A lawyer for The Providence Journal made a request to be allowed into the hearing. But the judge refused the media access, saying it was a care and protection hearing.

The Corneaus are two of 13 members of a Christian sect suspected of burying bodies of two young children in a Maine park last fall.

Members of the fundamentalist sect do not use hospitals or doctors and file no birth records. According to a group member's journal uncovered by investigators, the Corneaus son Jeremiah was thought to have been stillborn.

The other child, 10-month old Samuel Robidoux, allegedly starved to death after he stopped nursing.

Like David Corneau, Samuel's father, Jacques Robidoux, the sect's reputed leader, is among the eight sect members who are behind bars.

The journal claimed group members viewed Samuel's death as the will of God. Police have unsuccessfully searched the park three times for buried children.

Prosecutors were citing the state laws allowing officials to take custody of children who are suffering from abuse and neglect. They planned to argue that the law applied even to a fetus.

Back To Attleboro  

Back To Bible Based Cults & Isms

Legal Notice: The administration of this website was taken over about  September, 2004  by Med Trans 1, Inc.. The content on this site was the work of the late Jan Groenveld, and as such, Med Trans 1, Inc. is not knowledgeable about the specific content presented on this website, nor is responsible for any inaccuracies that may be discovered.

We wish to be fair to all parties involved, and there is no intent whatsoever to present inaccurate in formation.  Therefore, if any group or individual feels that information presented on this site is inaccurate, please contact us. If the information is proven to be inaccurate, it will be either changed or removed upon receipt of verifiable proof being supplied to us. Verifiable proof is defined as a disinterested source independent of your group such as newspaper, encyclopedia, public records and similar sources. 

Any group or individual who wishes to supply a rebuttal to any information presented on this site may do so at any time. The length of the rebuttal is to be no more in length (number of words) than the article or material being rebutted. The rebuttal is to be within an e-mail and not as an attachment. E-Mails with attachments are automatically deleted unread due to the large number of virus attacks we received in the past.

Literature, books etc. mailed to us will  be discarded unread unless we specifically requested the materials. Those who send mail that is abusive in nature or combative, will not receive a response from us. Nor will any article be debated or extensive discussions be engaged in regarding an article published.      

Any problems with the website, please contact the webmaster