Other Fake Popes

Other Fake Popes

Whilst William claims to be the "Pope of the Apocalypse", and head of the "Royal House of David", he's not the first to claim to be next in line for the Papacy. In fact, there are several people in the world today who claim they are either Pope, or are next in line, and appointed. William is just another in a long line of them. Seems he has a lot of competition.

Some interesting links to people who have or continue to claim the Papacy:

  • Michael Collin: Check this nut out. Claims to be Pope. "founded" The Order of the Magnificat of the Mother of God, in Canada. Excommunicated in 1951. The link takes you to a harrowing story from a victim of this person.
  • Clemente Dominguez y Gomez: Built a replica of St Peters. Has Papal robes and the whole shebang.Founded the "Order of the Last Times".
  • Lucian Pulvermacher: Check out this one. Another nut. Beleives he is the only true Pope. Writes his own enyclicals. Well designed webpages though.

If anyone has information on others who claim to be Pope, please email me and I'll include them here.

Legal Notice: The administration of this website was taken over about  September, 2004  by Med Trans 1, Inc.. The content on this site was the work of the late Jan Groenveld, and as such, Med Trans 1, Inc. is not knowledgeable about the specific content presented on this website, nor is responsible for any inaccuracies that may be discovered.

We wish to be fair to all parties involved, and there is no intent whatsoever to present inaccurate in formation.  Therefore, if any group or individual feels that information presented on this site is inaccurate, please contact us. If the information is proven to be inaccurate, it will be either changed or removed upon receipt of verifiable proof being supplied to us. Verifiable proof is defined as a disinterested source independent of your group such as newspaper, encyclopedia, public records and similar sources. 

Any group or individual who wishes to supply a rebuttal to any information presented on this site may do so at any time. The length of the rebuttal is to be no more in length (number of words) than the article or material being rebutted. The rebuttal is to be within an e-mail and not as an attachment. E-Mails with attachments are automatically deleted unread due to the large number of virus attacks we received in the past.

Literature, books etc. mailed to us will  be discarded unread unless we specifically requested the materials. Those who send mail that is abusive in nature or combative, will not receive a response from us. Nor will any article be debated or extensive discussions be engaged in regarding an article published.      

Any problems with the website, please contact the webmaster

Hit Counter