Backlash Builds Over Abuse Claims
13 June, 1994, San Jose Mercury News
BACKLASH BUILDS OVER ABUSE CLAIMS: THE PUBLIC IS NO LONGER
BUYING RITUAL CASES.
Monday, June 13, 1994 Section: California News Page: 3B Dateline: San Diego
By: LAURA MECOY, McClatchy News Service
Dale Akiki's eyes bulge from a head that is too large for his body. His hair is a woolly mat,
his chest is concave and he walks with a limp.
His attorneys and he say his appearance and his limited intellectual abilities, both the result
of genetic defects, triggered parental fears that led to dozens of children claiming Akiki
sexually molested them and forced them to participate in bizarre rituals during Sunday
school classes.
But the disabilities also turned this 36-year-old naval supply worker's case into a "cause
celebre" when -- after more than two years in jail and seven months in trial -- a jury quickly
acquitted Akiki of 35 abuse charges.
The jury, and a grand jury's harsh criticism of Akiki's prosecution, helped topple
California's longest-serving district attorney, San Diego's Ed Miller, in Tuesday's elections.
The veteran prosecutor's defeat is seen as the latest sign that a backlash is brewing against
the numerous ritual child-abuse cases that sprang up after the public first heard of satanic
rituals at Manhattan Beach's McMartin Preschool in 1984.
Increasing challenges
The public and the media, which largely believed these charges at first, are increasingly
challenging claims that large groups of children are being abused by satanists and other cult
members who sacrifice animals, kill babies, threaten death and engage in other horrific practices.
"We hope we are the first domino," Kate Coyne, Akiki's public defender, said. "We are
cooperating with anyone who asks for our assistance."
Los Angeles psychiatrist Roland Summit, a leading proponent of ritual child-abuse
theories, said the public backlash already has caused some district attorneys to shy away
from prosecuting such cases.
"It's poison," the Harbor/UCLA Medical Center psychiatrist said. "That is not to say the
prosecutions don't occur anymore. . . . These little kid abuse cases in preschools are just
not prosecutable. That's not to say it's not true. It's just hard to convince the public."
Casting further doubt on ritual child-abuse charges is the controversy surrounding the
"recovered memories" of adults and children who claim to recall sexual abuse long after it
occurred.
Therapists contend most ritual child-abuse victims deny the abuse initially and will only
reveal it after several counseling sessions. Critics say the lengthy therapy sessions actually
create "false" rather than "recovered" memories.
During his trial, Akiki's defenders blamed therapists for the children's recollections of
naked sex games, water torture, kidnapping, the sacrifice of an elephant and a giraffe and
other bizarre rituals.
'Overzealous'
Special Agent Ken Lanning, the FBI's top child sexual abuse expert, said several
explanations could account for distorted memories, including what he calls "overzealous
intervenors."
He said trauma, mental illness, normal childhood fears and fantasies, urban legends and
deliberate efforts by offenders to confuse and trick victims could lead children and adults to
remember events that never occurred.
Lanning, who initially believed satanic cults were involved in child abuse, said there is
"little or no evidence" of the original claims that satanists conspired to infiltrate child-care
centers.
Caught in the middle of this ongoing debate over ritual child abuse are the two protagonists
in the long-running San Diego case: Akiki, the formerly accused, and Miller, his former
accuser.
After 23 years of heading up the San Diego District Attorney's office, Miller had achieved
renown among prosecutors and had drawn no opposition in four of his last five re-election
campaigns.
That all changed after the Akiki acquittal last November. Four opponents challenged
Miller's re-election, and a grand jury issued a report highly critical of the Akiki
prosecution.
Investigators never found any physical evidence to corroborate preschoolers' claims that
Akiki mutilated and killed animals, used guns and knives to threaten the children, hung the
children upside down, dunked their heads in feces-filled toilets and urinated on them.
The children claimed this physical and sexual abuse occurred during the 90 minutes they
attended Sunday school classes elsewhere in the building where their parents attended
worship services. Yet no parent nor any Sunday school supervisor reported seeing any abuse.
|