ENGLISH TRANSLATION OF
"DE CRUCIS LIBER PRIMUS"

The following is the translation from Latin to English of excerpts from "DE CRUCE LIBER PRIMUS.

"...I commence the subject: I establish a two old kind of cross (in this subject) which is to be explained, namely the single and double (put together) kinds. I call. at the former kind when the attachment is done on a single wooden plank. And this cross, in my opinion, was the earliest type, and developed into another form from this primitive shape. But there is also a double kind, as I have already touched upon. The one is for binding, the other for nailing. For at one time they either bound a man, to a tree or post, or they nailed him...." Page 647, The page featured in the Kingdom Interlinear Translation (1969)

CHAPTER IX

"The cross (is) strengthened and inserted from the Church fathers'writings: They themselves explained by others and with pictures By ourselves also. "Briefly the cross was inserted and the other crosswise bar is joined and inserted with the upright plank, and thus it cuts (divides) itself. Thus there are always some projections and a little head (the top?),otherwise that in the Commissa? Also here the angles (from the end) are four borders each, but there, there are three each. Who has any doubt about this matter? The pictures and old writings equally hurl this at our eyes."

Page 650

"I do not know whether the words of Innocent to this matter should be referred to: 'In the Lord's cross there were four pieces of wood, the upright beam, the crossbar, a tree trunk (piece of wood) placed below, and the title (inscription) placed above......When I examine many following words of Innocent, I would say he did not know about this board place in, but truly (as he says) he knew about the trunk placed below, from which the cross itself rose.Thus it appears he knew this; that there was some kind of trunk, and either it was placed at the bottom of the cross to prop it (the Greekscall this kind of oblique prop 'registers ' ) or the trunk was placed under the upright beam itself in the ground, to which it was inserted-so that the beam might stand more firmly...... Also they hand down (this a count by) Irenaeus: ' The construction itself of the cross has five ends; "two on the vertical and two on the horizontal, and one in -he middle where the person attached with nails rested. '.....They divide the cross into five ends ('points' Tertullian called them), those four which are known (familiar) and extend out; and the fifth which they place in the middle of the crass, where the transverse beam cuts and crosses the fixed beam...... "I have translated these passages as accurately as possible andto the best of my ability". (Marie Tseng, Teaching Assistant, Universityof S. California, USA. 10/3/76)4

Click HereClick here to go Back

Legal Notice: The administration of this website was taken over about  September, 2004  by Med Trans 1, Inc.. The content on this site was the work of the late Jan Groenveld, and as such, Med Trans 1, Inc. is not knowledgeable about the specific content presented on this website, nor is responsible for any inaccuracies that may be discovered.

We wish to be fair to all parties involved, and there is no intent whatsoever to present inaccurate in formation.  Therefore, if any group or individual feels that information presented on this site is inaccurate, please contact us. If the information is proven to be inaccurate, it will be either changed or removed upon receipt of verifiable proof being supplied to us. Verifiable proof is defined as a disinterested source independent of your group such as newspaper, encyclopedia, public records and similar sources. 

Any group or individual who wishes to supply a rebuttal to any information presented on this site may do so at any time. The length of the rebuttal is to be no more in length (number of words) than the article or material being rebutted. The rebuttal is to be within an e-mail and not as an attachment. E-Mails with attachments are automatically deleted unread due to the large number of virus attacks we received in the past.

Literature, books etc. mailed to us will  be discarded unread unless we specifically requested the materials. Those who send mail that is abusive in nature or combative, will not receive a response from us. Nor will any article be debated or extensive discussions be engaged in regarding an article published.      

Any problems with the website, please contact the webmaster

Hit Counter