Five Common Fallacies--Don't Be Fooled by Them!The Awake! magazine May 22, 1990 begins an article on page 12 piece titled "Five Common Fallacies--Don't Be Fooled by Them!" It is about distinguishing truth from fallacy and contains warnings on how to not be mislead by the deceptive persuasiveness of logical fallacies. Five in all are enumerated. I shall explicate each but, for the life of me, I do not understand why the WT Society would print such an article; it clearly fingers them as employing deceptive fallacies. They fit each of the five! FALLACY NUMBER 1 - Attacking the Person Awake: "This type of fallacy attempts to disprove or discredit a perfectly valid argument or statement by making an irrelevant attack on the person presenting it...some attacked Jesus himself, saying: 'He has a demon and is mad. Why do you listen to him?' (John 10:20; comp. Acts 26:24, 25)...But while personal attacks, subtle and not so subtle, may intimidate and persuade, never do they disprove what has been said. So be alert to this fallacy!" Is the Watchtower guilty of Fallacy number 1? YES! Comment:"Yes, apostates publish literature that resorts to distortions, half-truths, and outright falsehood. They even picket Witness conventions," [sounds familiar] "trying to trap the unwary. Hence, it would be a dangerous thing to allow our curiousity to move us to feed on such writings or to listen to their abusive speech!...What now, are the fruits of the apostates and their publications? (1) Cleverness...(2) Pirdeful intelligence. (3) Lack of love. (4) Dishonesty in various forms." (WT 7/1/94, p. 12) FALLACY NUMBER 2 - Appealing to Authority Awake: "This form of verbal intimidation is accomplished by invoking the testimonials of so-called experts or famous people. Of course, for advice it is only natural to look to people who know more about something that we do. But not all appeals to authority are based on sound reasoning...Interestingly, clergymen today are known to resort to similar tactics when unable to prove from the Bible such teachings as the Trinity, the immortality of the soul, and hellfire." Is the Watchtower guilty of Fallacy number 2? YES! Comment:Finest examples of appealing to authority (and INTENTIONALLY misquoting them and taking their words out of context) in order to provide support for their unsupportable doctrines include the brochure "Why Should You Believe in the Trinity?" and the incredible "Life--How Did it Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation?" (1985) Talk about resorting to distortions, half-truths, and outright falsehoods! FALLACY NUMBER 3 - 'Join the Crowd' Awake: "Here the appeal is to popular emotions, prejudices, and beliefs. People generally like to conform. We tend to shrink at the thought of speaking out against prevailing opinions. This tendencyto view the majority opinion as automatically correct is used with potent effect in the 'join-the-crowd' fallacy." Is the Watchtower guilty of Fallacy number 3? YES! Comment:"Come to Jehovah's organization for salvation". "Avoid independent thinking" (WT 1/15/83, p. 22) "Do not run ahead of Jehovah's organization but humbly submit." FALLACY NUMBER 4 - Either/Or Reasoning Awake: "This fallacy reduces what may be a wide range of options to only two. For example, a person may be told: 'Either you accept a blood transfusion or you will die.'" Is the Watchtower guilty of Fallacy number 4? YES! Comment:"Either you refuse a blood transfusion or you will be destroyed at Armaggedon." Awake: "So when presented with either/or reasoning, ask yourself, ' Are there really only two possible choices? Might there be others'?" Comment:"Come to Jehovah's organization for salvation". FALLACY NUMBER 5 - Oversimplification Awake: Here a statement or argument ignores relevant considerations, oversimplifying what may be a complex issue...For example, you may read: 'Rapid population growth is the cause of poverty in developing countries.' There's an element of truth in that, but it ignores other important considerations, such as political mismanagement, commercial exploitation, and weather patterns. Oversimplification has resulted in many misunderstandings when it comes to God's Word, the Bible. Consider, for example, the account at Acts 16:30, 31. There a jailer asked a question about salvation. Paul answered: 'Believe on the Lord Jesus and you will get saved.' Many have concluded from this that simple mental acceptance of Jesus is therefore all that is required for salvation!" Is the Watchtower guilty of Fallacy number 5? YES! Comment:"The word Trinity is not found in the Bible". There's an element of truth to that WT Society, but understanding the very being of the Almighty God is not so "cut-n-dried". Also, the above Awake! quotation is intentionally deceptive in that it makes it appear that the jailer was giving mere "mental acceptance" to his believing on the Lord Jesus and that anyone who uses this scriptural passage is merely giving mental assent to Jesus as Lord and Savior and nothing more than that. Believing is more that mental acceptance. It is a heartfelt appreciation and unshakeable faith in something. In the jailer's case, faith in Jesus Christ. One does not have to go through "80 Questions" or pass any other kind of bible quiz in order to qualify as a believer in Jesus Christ. Note also that the WT is also guilty of UNDERsimplification in that they take a simple bible truth and slab layers upon layers of doctrinal fat in order to make it look like something it is not. |
|
Legal Notice: The administration of this website was taken over about September, 2004 by Med Trans 1, Inc.. The content on this site was the work of the late Jan Groenveld, and as such, Med Trans 1, Inc. is not knowledgeable about the specific content presented on this website, nor is responsible for any inaccuracies that may be discovered. We wish to be fair to all parties involved, and there is no intent whatsoever to present inaccurate in formation. Therefore, if any group or individual feels that information presented on this site is inaccurate, please contact us. If the information is proven to be inaccurate, it will be either changed or removed upon receipt of verifiable proof being supplied to us. Verifiable proof is defined as a disinterested source independent of your group such as newspaper, encyclopedia, public records and similar sources. Any group or individual who wishes to supply a rebuttal to any information presented on this site may do so at any time. The length of the rebuttal is to be no more in length (number of words) than the article or material being rebutted. The rebuttal is to be within an e-mail and not as an attachment. E-Mails with attachments are automatically deleted unread due to the large number of virus attacks we received in the past. Literature, books etc. mailed to us will be discarded unread unless we specifically requested the materials. Those who send mail that is abusive in nature or combative, will not receive a response from us. Nor will any article be debated or extensive discussions be engaged in regarding an article published. Any problems with the website, please contact the webmaster
|