White Heart, Pure Skin

Colleen Ralson

Shortly after the LDS Church was pressured into giving the Blacks the priesthood in 1978, a very noticeable and controversial change occurred in their next edition of the Book of Mormon. In 2 Nephi 30:6, the word "white" was quietly changed to read "pure" without explanation or notation. LDS leaders staunchly denied, however, that this change had anything to do with their latest mandate allowing Blacks to hold the priesthood.

Mormons have been told and many of them parrot that the change was made because "pure" means the same thing as "white." If "pure" and "white" mean the same thing, why was the change necessary? Why were other verses not changed where the word "white" appeared? Why are there verses that say "white" and "pure?"

For consistency "white" could have been changed in 1 Nephi 8:11 to read "pure fruit," or 2 Nephi 5:21, to "pure skin." Or 3 Nephi 12:36 to "pure hair," or Ether 3:1 to "pure stones." Or instead of using the word "pure" in 1 Nephi 13:25 they could have substituted "white gospel," or in 1 Nephi 14:26 to "white writings." The wording in 2 Nephi 9:47 could be "white minds," and 2 Nephi 25:16 would be "white hearts." Alma 14:19 could have been switched to "white testimony" and Mormon 7:47, to "white love."

If pure and white were indeed synonymous there is yet another strange aspect of the Mormon's questionable explanation. For in Alma 5:21, these folks have garments that are "pure and white," and Alma 32:42, tells of fruit that is "pure and white." That is like saying it was "white and white" or "pure and pure." Not only that, in Alma 32:42 it also states some fruit was, "white above all white," and "pure above all that is pure." Is not this rather repetitious if they both mean the same thing?

But perhaps the most unbelievable and offensive parts in the Book of Mormon that need changing are verses like 2 Nephi 5:21. In this account Nephi's brothers will not accept him as their ruler and teacher. Because of their iniquity and hard hearts, their once white and exceeding fair and delightsome skin is turned black. And in Nephi 30:6, the Lamanites, whose skin was turned black, are told that in not many more years they will again become white (pre-1978) or just pure (post-1978) and delight some.

In Jacob 3:9 it is reported that the white Nephites have become filthy and not pure in heart, so God threatens to "lead away their righteousness from among them." The white Nephites hated their brethren, the once bad and black Lamanites. But the black Lamanites, have now become more righteous than the once good but now wicked white Nephites. God tells the Nephites that the Lamanites' skin would be whiter than theirs if they, the Nephites, did not repent. God, however, does not seem very just. He does not even hint that he might curse them and change their skin black. But, by 3 Nephi 3:14, the now righteous, but still black Lamanites, "united with the Nephites.... and their curse was taken from them and their skins became white."

From these passages one could deduct that black skin equates with evil and wickedness, and God's disfavor. And white skin must show righteousness, and God's approval. How sad and totally preposterous. Despite all these amazing stories of chameleon-like skin changes in the Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi 26:30 teaches that the Lord did not show favoritism as, "He denieth none that come unto him, black and white... all are alike unto God." But he did deny some - the blacks - until 1978, anyway.

To cut through this muddle in Mormonism, one need only turn to God's infallible word, the Bible, and know the just, trustworthy, and loving God is not prejudiced. "For the Lord seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the Lord looketh on the heart," (1 Samuel 16:7).


© Copyright 1996 Watchman Fellowship, Inc. The material on this site shall not be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted by any means without permission from the publisher.


Legal Notice: The administration of this website was taken over about  September, 2004  by Med Trans 1, Inc.. The content on this site was the work of the late Jan Groenveld, and as such, Med Trans 1, Inc. is not knowledgeable about the specific content presented on this website, nor is responsible for any inaccuracies that may be discovered.

We wish to be fair to all parties involved, and there is no intent whatsoever to present inaccurate in formation.  Therefore, if any group or individual feels that information presented on this site is inaccurate, please contact us. If the information is proven to be inaccurate, it will be either changed or removed upon receipt of verifiable proof being supplied to us. Verifiable proof is defined as a disinterested source independent of your group such as newspaper, encyclopedia, public records and similar sources. 

Any group or individual who wishes to supply a rebuttal to any information presented on this site may do so at any time. The length of the rebuttal is to be no more in length (number of words) than the article or material being rebutted. The rebuttal is to be within an e-mail and not as an attachment. E-Mails with attachments are automatically deleted unread due to the large number of virus attacks we received in the past.

Literature, books etc. mailed to us will  be discarded unread unless we specifically requested the materials. Those who send mail that is abusive in nature or combative, will not receive a response from us. Nor will any article be debated or extensive discussions be engaged in regarding an article published.      

Any problems with the website, please contact the webmaster

Hit Counter